Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Skeptasmic's avatar

None of the Buenos Aires specimens were tested for blood type. Lanciano was never tested for Rh factor (+/-) but Tixtla tested AB-. The likelihood of false positives varies by the type of test, but essentially the reason a particularly dirty specimen is likely to test AB is the same reason al large American High School is likely to have both a John and a Matt. Contaminants that will test A and contaminants that will test B are common enough that if you get a whole ton of different contaminants together it's likely you'll wind up with both.

Are you aware that the image you used is from a claimed Eucharistic Miracle of Julia Kim? The Archbishop has said that "The faithful are reminded that these false teachings and associated devotional material should not be promoted or distributed"

https://chancery.catholic.sg/wp-content/uploads/sites/13/2025/10/Chancery-Notice-CHN-CN-2025-026.pdf

redbert's avatar

>Also based on my limited research, this doesn’t seem to be a case of systematic classification bias. It’s not as if type AB is particularly more likely to appear in false positive human blood tests compared to other types. Skeptics of the eucharistic miracles point to possible bacterial or antigen explanations as opposed to human blood. Whether that is the case is debateable; however, this does not explain why all the tests from the substances across times and places end up resolving specifically to type AB.

yes it absolutely does

why is the church not sequencing dna?

4 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?